All case studies Fraunhofer IPA
Case study · April 2026

Closing the loop in Battery Can Manufacturing

AI-based defect prediction for spin-grooving

Download PDF (~19 MB)
30% → <3%
Observed defect rate reduction during validation

The problem

In spin-grooving, defects emerge from non-linear interactions between machine parameters, tool positioning, and material response. It is a multivariate chain that is hard to debug from final-part outcomes alone.

"The causal chain from parameter settings to force evolution to defect formation is managed through iterative adjustment and post-process inspection and not structured evaluation during setup."

Result

During validation, this approach reduced the observed defect rate from 30% to less than 3%. More broadly, physics-informed AI makes complex forming processes more predictable, less dependent on tacit expert knowledge, and more scalable across production steps in advanced manufacturing.

Spin-grooving process - Fraunhofer IPA case study
Fraunhofer IPA, Stuttgart - March 2026

Want the full write-up, charts and all?

Download PDF (~19 MB)

Stay in the loop

Get a short note when we publish the next case study. No marketing fluff, unsubscribe anytime.

Exploring a similar project?

Tell us about your process and the quality signals you're trying to act on. We'll show you where a physics-informed approach can close the loop.

Discuss your use case

Thanks for downloading our case study!

Want a short note when the next case study lands? No marketing fluff, unsubscribe anytime.